Published
Yes. Having six official languages does not prevent a UN General Assembly delegate from speaking another language. The delegation must provide interpretation or a written translation into an official language under the applicable arrangements.
UN Geneva's meeting guidance explicitly cites General Assembly rule 53. It explains that UN interpreters use the supplied interpretation or accepted written text to interpret the statement into other official languages. The educational publisher CliffsNotes independently describes the same allowance.
The six official languages are Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish. Permission to deliver a speech in another language does not give that language official status. When a written translation is used, UN Geneva's guidance also requires someone from the delegation to help interpreters follow the speaker through the text.
A non-official language can be used for a speech, provided the delegation supplies the necessary language support.
United Nations Office at Geneva
Citing General Assembly rule 53, the guidance allows statements in non-official languages when a delegation supplies an interpreter or a written text in an official language. Additional support is required when using a written text.
Based on: United Nations Office at Geneva
CliffsNotes
The explainer states that a delegate or guest speaking an unofficial language must supply interpretation or a written version in an official UN language.
Based on: CliffsNotes
United Nations Office at Geneva
UN Geneva lists Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish as the UN's six official languages.
Based on: United Nations Office at Geneva
Was this check helpful?
Sign in required
Sign in required
No. Only states can be parties in the ICJ's contentious cases. Its separate advisory procedure is available to authorized UN bodies, not individual applicants.
Yes. Article 22 requires the head of mission's consent before host-country authorities enter embassy premises. This protection is called inviolability.
No. World Heritage inscription does not transfer ownership to UNESCO. The convention respects national sovereignty and property rights under national law.