Trooday
Conceptual illustration of an optical atomic-clock laboratory with an ion trap and laser components.
Science & Space

Has Singapore's new lutetium clock already redefined the second?

Published

Verdict
False
Verification confidenceHigh

Explanation

No. The lutetium clock announced by the National University of Singapore on 23 September 2026 has not changed the official definition of the second. That definition still uses a specified transition in caesium-133.

The university describes its clock as a precision advance and discusses a possible future redefinition. Independently, NIST's current reference states that the second is defined by fixing the caesium transition frequency at 9,192,631,770 hertz.

Building a better clock and adopting a new definition are separate steps. Optical-clock research can contribute evidence for a future standard, but announcing an experimental result does not itself replace the existing unit definition.

Key takeaway

A new atomic clock does not automatically redefine time's basic unit. The official second remains based on caesium-133.

Evidence

The announcement describes a future redefinition

National University of Singapore

Contradicts the claim

The university's September 2026 announcement presents optical clocks as candidates contributing to a redefinition expected in or after 2030, rather than reporting an adopted replacement.

Based on: National University of Singapore

The current definition remains based on caesium

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Contradicts the claim

NIST's reference defines the second using the caesium-133 transition frequency fixed at 9,192,631,770 hertz. It does not define the unit using lutetium.

Based on: National Institute of Standards and Technology

Was this check helpful?

Sign in required

Sign in required

How we check claims

Related checks

A bat resting in a natural roost with its eyes visible.
Science & Space

Are bats blind?

No. Bats have functional eyes and can see. Their visual abilities vary between species, so limited detail vision should not be confused with blindness.

Verdict
False
Verification confidenceHigh